On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Matt Whitlock <b...@mattwhitlock.name> wrote: > However, this proposal currently fails to answer a very important question: > > • What is the mechanism for activation of the new consensus rule? It is when > a certain percentage of the blocks mined in a 2016-block retargeting period > contain valid block-size votes?
I chose not to address hard fork methodology at this stage because I wanted to focus on the main algorithm. There are a number of options open to us for deployment including a simple fixed activation (which I think is feasible because there is a a lot of awareness and the industry shows they are willing to rally around a single proposal). If there are any strong preferences, I can add a deployment section although I think it's less interesting until we forge a clear way forward with what blocksize proposal to use. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
