This is the best proposal I've seen yet. Allow me to summarize:

• It addresses the problem, in Jeff Garzik's BIP 100, of miners selling their 
block-size votes.
• It addresses the problem, in Gavin Andresen's BIP 101, of blindly trying to 
predict future market needs versus future technological capacities.
• It avoids a large step discontinuity in the block-size limit by starting with 
a 1-MB limit.
• It throttles changes to ±10% every 2016 blocks.
• It imposes a tangible cost (higher difficulty) on miners who vote to raise 
the block-size limit.
• It avoids incentivizing miners to vote to lower the block-size limit.

However, this proposal currently fails to answer a very important question:

• What is the mechanism for activation of the new consensus rule? It is when a 
certain percentage of the blocks mined in a 2016-block retargeting period 
contain valid block-size votes?


https://github.com/btcdrak/bips/blob/bip-cbbsra/bip-cbbrsa.mediawiki


On Friday, 28 August 2015, at 9:28 pm, Btc Drak via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Pull request: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/187
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to