Rusty Russell 於 2015-08-26 23:08 寫到:
- We should immediately deploy an IsStandard() rule which insists that nSequence is 0xFFFFFFFF or 0, so nobody screws themselves when we soft fork and they had random junk in there.
This is not needed because BIP68 is not active for version 1 tx. No existing wallet would be affected.
Aside: I'd also like to have nLockTime apply even if nSequence != 0xFFFFFFFF (another mistake I made). So I'd like an IsStandard() rule to say it nLockTime be 0 if an nSequence != 0xFFFFFFFF. Would that screw anyone currently?
Do you mean "have nLockTime apply even if nSequence = 0xFFFFFFFF"? This is a softfork. Should we do this together with BIP65, BIP68 and BIP112?
Thanks, Rusty.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
