On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 03:45:48PM -0700, Adam Back via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Wouldnt the experience for SPV nodes be chaotic? If the full nodes > are 50:50 XT and bitcoin core, then SPV clients would connect at > random and because XT and core will diverge immediately after > activation.
Actually not necessarily! To my knowledge there aren't any SPV implementations that do address caching; they all use the peer servers in a centralized fashion every time they connect. If those peer servers are setup to only return nodes on one side of the fork or the other, that's all they'll connect too and they'll never see another chain. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000402fe6fb9ad613c93e12bddfc6ec02a2bd92f002050594d
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
