On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:04 PM, Eric Lombrozo <elombr...@gmail.com> wrote: > But the consensus code should NOT be subject to the same commit policies…and > we should make an effort to separate the two clearly. And we should find a > way to communicate the difference succinctly and clearly to laypeople (which > is something I think the XT opponents have been horrible at doing so far).
I think that effort is in progress (again, much slower that I would like it to be) and it's called libconsensus. Once we have libconsensus Bitcoin Core it's just another implementation (even if it is the reference one) and it's not "the specification of the consensus rules" which is a "privileged" position that brings all sorts of misunderstandings and problems (the block size debate is just one example). _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
