On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Jorge Timón <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think just using version=4 for cltv and friends would be a
> problem if it wasn't for the XT/nonXT issue.
What problem am I missing if we just mask of the offending bits. For my own
project which uses auxpow (and thus has weird nVersion), I also used the
bitmasking method to get rid of auxpow version bits before making the
standard integer comparisons to deploy BIP66 using IsSuperMajority():
if ((block.nVersion & 0xff) >= 4 && CBlockIndex::IsSuperMajority(...))
{ //...}
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
