One could think that this could help with things like SPV mining, but miners can just pay to themselves to follow the minimum size block rule without risking anything. As long as they have a singled matured satoshi they can just pay to themselves with it as many times as they need in the same block.
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Patrick Strateman via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > The first question to answer here is simple: > > What value would there be in requiring a minimum block size? > > I see no value. > > > On 08/16/2015 05:30 PM, Jeff Garzik via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > "minimum" an interesting topic. > > - Traffic levels may not produce a minimum size block > - Miners can always collude to produce a lowered maximum block size, a sort > of minimum maximum > > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Levin Keller via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> as with the current "max block size" debate I was wondering: Is anyone >> here in favor of a minimum block size (say 2 MB or so)? If so I would be >> interested in an exchange (maybe off-list) of ideas. I am in favor of a >> lower limit and am giving it quite a bit of thought at the moment. >> >> Cheers >> >> Levin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> bitcoin-dev mailing list >> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
