On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev" < [email protected]> wrote: Note that I've > been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork > proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr
No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do first. Also, please keep this thread about Lightning. -- Pieter
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
