On Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jorge Timón <jti...@jtimon.cc> wrote: >> >> >> On Aug 7, 2015 5:55 PM, "Gavin Andresen" <gavinandre...@gmail.com> wrote: > Executive summary: when networks get over-saturated, they become unreliable. Unreliable is bad. > > Unreliable and expensive is extra bad, and that's where we're headed without an increase to the max block size.
I'm not trying to be obstinate but I seriously can't see how they are different. When you say unreliable I think you mean "unreliable for cheap fee transactions". Transactions with the highest fees will always confirm reliably. For example, a 1 btc fee tx will probably always confirm very reliably even if capacity never increases and demands increases a lot.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
