On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Btc Drak <btcd...@gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally, correct me if I am wrong, but the net effect from preventing > fees rising from zero would be to guarantee miners have no alternative > income from fees as block subsidy dries up and thus harm the incentives to > secure the chain.
I don't think that's necessarily true. Theoretically urgent transactions could fund hashing power on their own while there are still some free non-urgent transactions being mined from time to time. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev