I think implicit QoS is far simpler to implement, requires less parties and is 
closer to what Bitcoin started out as: a peer-to-peer digital cash system, not 
a peer-to-let-me-handle-that-for-you-to-peer system.

jp

> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:08 AM, Eric Lombrozo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> By using third parties separate from individual miners that do bidding on 
> your behalf you get a mechanism that allows QoS guarantees and shifting the 
> complexity and risk from the wallet with little computational resources to a 
> service with abundance of them. Using timelocked contracts it’s possible to 
> enforce the guarantees.
> 
> Negotiating directly with miners via smart contracts seems difficult at best.
> 
> 
>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 6:03 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Doesn't matter.
>> 
>> It's not going to be perfect given the block time variance among other 
>> factors but it's far more workable than guessing whether or not your 
>> transaction is going to end up in a block at all.
>> 
>> jp
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Peter Todd <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 23 July 2015 20:49:20 GMT-04:00, Jean-Paul Kogelman via bitcoin-dev 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> And it's obvious how a size cap would interfere with such a QoS scheme.
>>>> Miners wouldn't be able to deliver the below guarantees if they have to
>>>> start excluding transactions.
>>> 
>>> As mining is a random, poisson process, obviously giving guarantees without 
>>> a majority of hashing power isn't possible.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>> 
>>> iQE9BAEBCAAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJVsYyK
>>> AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lnc47AH/28WlecQLb37CiJpcvXO9tC4zqYEodurtB9nBHTSJrug
>>> VIEXZW53pSTdd3vv2qpGIlHxuYP8QmDSATztwQLuN6XWEszz7TO8MXBfLxKqZyGu
>>> i83WqSGjMAfwqjl0xR1G7PJgt4+E+0vaAFZc98vLCgZnedbiXRVtTGjhofG1jjTc
>>> DFMwMZHP0eqWTwtWwqUvnA7PTFHxdqoJruY/t1KceN+JDbBCJWMxBDswU64FXcVH
>>> 0ecsk9nhLMyylBX/2v4HjCXyayocH8jQ+FpLSP0xxERyS+f1npFX9cxFMq24uXqn
>>> PcnZfLfaSJ6gMbmhbYG5wYDKN3u732j7dLzSJnMW6jk=
>>> =LY1+
>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> bitcoin-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
> 
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to