There really isn't any need for a 3rd party here. Those "services" can just be the miners themselves.
jp > On Jul 24, 2015, at 8:56 AM, Eric Lombrozo <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jul 23, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Quality of service as in: >> >>> X satoshi / kb = included in block currently worked on; >> >>> Y satoshi / kb = included in next block; >> >>> Z satoshi / kb = included in block after that, etc. >> >> Block count starts when transaction is first seen. Miners can set X, Y, Z. >> >> Market develops when miners start setting different values and adding more >> transactions to blocks as opposed to other miners with higher settings. >> >> It basically comes down to the miners themselves if they want a healthy fee >> market. If they stick to their guns, their influence on the fees will be >> proportional to their hashing power. >> >> jp > > > The scheme I’ve been considering is the use of services (separate from > miners) that guarantee inclusion for you for some predetermined price and > then do the bidding on your behalf. Via contracts you can guarantee you get > included within a certain number of blocks or you receive a full refund…or > even possibly receive compensation for failure to deliver. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
