On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I personally *don't* think he's doing that, rather I believe he knows > full well it's a bad patch and is proposing it because he wants to push > discussion towards a solution. Often trolling the a audience with bad > patches is an effective way to motivate people to respond by writing > better ones; Jeff has told me he often does exactly that. > > I think in this case we shouldn't do anything, so short-circuiting that > process by pointing out what he's doing publicly makes sense. > Assuming that's what Jeff is doing, how does preventing better solutions from emerging 'make sense'?
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
