> > In my previous post, I was suggesting to *not* include the proof in the > request, because the payer can download it independently. Only the final > signature is needed. What makes DNSSEC interesting is not the size of > the proof, but rather the fact that you can request it easily, and in a > canonical way. >
Yes, but you still need the final signature. Is it possible to use an EC signature with DNSSEC? I thought it was an all-RSA system. If I'm wrong about that, and all you need is 32 bytes, then my argument does not hold.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
