>That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing the whole community.
I'll take that as a "no". But it's a strange bar to set: perfect representation of entire community. By that token, nobody can say anything is controversial if a different group is disagreeing. Greg On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, NxtChg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, "Greg Sanders" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork? > > That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing > the whole community. > > And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too. > > >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
