Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> writes: >> I was facing the same issue before, and unfortunately, RFC 5838 >> explicitly forbids IPv4 over IPv6 for OSPF. > > Well, we could add 'extended next hop' option to override it, even if it > would be non-standard. It is rather small deviation. That would be amazing. It might also give a good testbed to write a follow up RFC on it later, in case there are others who also want to run their core IPv4 free. > I also thought about 'integrated-OSPFv3', where both IPv4 and IPv6 ranges > are propagated in one instance, but that seems like much larger deviation. After reading RFC5838, I absolutely agree with you. -- Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch
- OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 only? Nico Schottelius via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 only? Sebastian Hahn
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 only? Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 o... Sebastian Hahn
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 only? Ondrej Zajicek
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 o... Nico Schottelius via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IPv6 o... Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 over IP... Sebastian Hahn via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for IPv4 ov... Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for IPv... Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Pim van Pelt via Bird-users
- Re: OSPF for... Ondrej Zajicek via Bird-users