On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:02:25AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote: > 240.0.0.0/4 is marked as reserved and considered invalid by BIRD. At > work, we are using this range internally since all RFC 1918 are full > and 100.64.0.0/10 is already used too. BIRD complains loudly for each > interface using this range. > > This change makes it possible to use this range. I have used scope > "universe". But I would be happy with "site" too. While widely > discussed, I don't think 240/4 will become routable on the Internet > one day.
Hi Updated BIRD to accept 240/4 as 'site' scope. We went with slightly different patch: https://gitlab.nic.cz/labs/bird/-/commit/269bfff9bf4b2349248bb48ff61009cf1c5a4aec -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
