On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 06:36:05PM +0200, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > > me.dr is 0 because ifa->drip is 0, but should it have declared itself > > as an eligible DR? > > Oh, you meant DR IP, not neghbor IP. I think that it is correct - the > process should start with the node idea of DR IP, which is initially > zero (RFC 2328 9.4. the first paragraph).
Just reviewed the election code and it seems consistent to the algorithm in RFC 2328. If no electable neighbor is there and me.dr / me.bdr is initially zero, then it should elect itself as BDR in the first round (also elect itself as DR by the ndr==NULL condition), and elect itself as DR in the second election. Could you add some debug output to check the value of DR and BDR (both ID and IP) after first and possibly second round? -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
