On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 01:19:57PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 1 septembre 2017 13:12 +0200, Ondrej Zajicek <santi...@crfreenet.org> : > > >> > Also, alien routes are correctly parsed when next-hops are correctly > >> > ordered (I didn't check if this restriction is also present for IPv4 or > >> > if Linux is always sending IPv4 multipath routes with next-hops > >> > correctly ordered) > >> > >> It's the same for IPv4. Dunno if it should be considered as a bug? > > > > Not sure what is a problem here. Do you mean that alien routes are not > > correctly parsed when next-hops are not ordered? How does the problem > > manifests? > > Yes. > > 2017-09-01T13:19:20.741524+02:00 V1-1 bird6: Ignoring unsorted multipath > route 2001:db8:a5::/64 received via kernel1 > > The route: > > 2001:db8:a5::/64 metric 1024 > nexthop via 2001:db8:ff::3 dev vti4 weight 1 > nexthop via 2001:db8:ff::1 dev vti3 weight 1
OK, seems like this issue is fixed in 2.0 branch but we forgot to backport to 1.6.x branch. Will fix it. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
