On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:29:01PM +0200, 'Gustavo Ponza' wrote: > Hi Ondrej, > > >Using BGP-based routing in NBMA tunnels is an interesting approach. We > >definitely should support this. But i would avoid things like 'krt_tunnel' > >attribute until we have support for lightweight tunnels using RTA_ENCAP. > > > >For IPIP tunnels, it seems like simplest approach is just to allow setting > >'onlink' flag and iface from BGP import filter, like: > > > >onlink = true; > >iface = "tunl0"; > >gw = bgp_nexthop; > > > >and some option that avoids default gateway setting by BGP protocol. > >Does this make sense? > > is it possible to extend the above feature for IPIP encapsulation > on RIPv2 routing environment? Thanks
Yes, most of that is protocol-independent. -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
