Yes, they are. Thank you, I'll check it. 03 нояб. 2014 г. 20:13 пользователь "Ondrej Zajicek" <santi...@crfreenet.org> написал:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 04:42:55PM +0100, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > > Firstly, in classical BGP implementations (but not in BIRD), for eBGP > connections, router-id is never used as tie-break. Instead, route age is > used (the oldest one wins) as tie-break. It avoids frequent route changes > and probably improves a little routes distribution. > > You'd better use "prefer older on". > > > > Secondly, a radical solution is (for incoming prefixes): > > - upstream 1: match net ~ 0.0.0.0/1 and set MED at 1, set MED at 0 for > everything else; > > - upstream 2: match net ~ 128.0.0.0/1 and set MED at 1, set MED at 0 > for everything else. > > Note that you should use 'med metric' option in this case (if your > uplinks are from different ASes). > > -- > Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo > > Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santi...@crfreenet.org) > OpenPGP encrypted e-mails preferred (KeyID 0x11DEADC3, wwwkeys.pgp.net) > "To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so." >
