Looks like BiocCodeTools should start checking whether people are using that and at least make a NOTE of it.
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Peter Hickey <peter.hic...@gmail.com> wrote: > A partial answer if you are using the 'testthat' framework: you can use > `testthat::skip_on_bioc()` to specify that a test should be skipped if it > is running on the BioC build machines. The test will otherwise be run > (e.g., during local development). There are some other `testthat::skip*()` > functions that may also be useful. > Cheers, > Pete > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 at 12:47 Levi Waldron <lwaldron.resea...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Any thoughts about how to implement optional or "extra" unit tests, that > > are too resource intensive to be part of the Bioconductor daily builds, > but > > that should be run once in a while, say with major updates? > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel