Are you discussing statistics of the same dimension as the data (unusual) or summary statistics? We should think about a MAE version of summary statistics, but that is not captured in current representation I would say.
Best, Kasper On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Vincent Carey <st...@channing.harvard.edu> wrote: > no answers yet? would it work to put your matrices as separate assays in a > SummarizedExperiment? > as long as they are conformant in dimensions and dimnames I think that > would work. That > SummarizedExperiment would then work well in an MAE. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Francesco Napolitano <franap...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to build a MultiAssayExperiment. However, in my case each > > assay should ideally include two matrices: one with a statistic and > > another one with the corresponding p-value. I'm currently managing > > each of them simply as a list of two matrices, but assay class expects > > table-like data. I must also be able to quickly extract entire rows or > > columns from each matrix. > > > > Is there a suitable way to model this into a MultiAssayExperiment? > > > > Thank you, > > Francesco > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
