And if not fixed on Sunday, surely Monday. Everyone has been working hard to get this to work; so just hang tight.
Best, Kasper On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Laurent Gatto <lg...@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 16 April 2016 09:42, Blattmann Peter wrote: > > > Dear all, > > > > I'm maintaining the SWATH2stats package and we just use the MSstats > > package in the vignette for showing an example workflow. As MSstats > > depends on MSnbase and this depends on mzR we receive an error to > > build our SWATH2stats package now. > > > > In light of the release schedule (where packages should pass R cmd > > build and check by April 15) how shall we proceed? Is it no problem > > that our package is included in the current release if we have install > > and build errors only on moscato2 but it builds correctly on the other > > operating systems? Or should we at one point take out the example > > workflow from the vignette? Or will the problem in mzR be solved in > > time and we don't have to worry? > > The problem has been fixed by Dan with help from Kasper and Jim and the > Rcpp team. Confirmation on Bioc build servers on Sunday. > > Details here > > https://github.com/sneumann/mzR/issues/36 > > Best wishes, > > Laurent > > > Best > > > > Peter > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bioc-devel [mailto:bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of > Steffen Neumann > > Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 11:03 AM > > To: Samuel Wieczorek; mailman, bioc-devel > > Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Build error on Moscato2 for mzR > > > > Hi Samuel, > > > > On Do, 2016-04-07 at 10:28 +0200, Samuel Wieczorek wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> which needs the mzR package. > >> The latter package has build error since a few days and this > >> propagates errors on the other packages. > > We're painfully aware of the build failure of mzR. I opened an issue for > it onhttps://github.com/sneumann/mzR/issues/36 > > > > I know one person who was able to build mzR on the new toolchainhttps:// > github.com/sneumann/mzR/issues/34#issuecomment-190231 > > 559 > > > > Unfortunately none of us is a Windows wizard, and I even failed to > install a working development environment on a virtual machine. If you or > someone else would help out with a patch for issue #36, that would be > awesome. I am currently unsure if we need to modify the CFLAGS so that only > one of the files contains the std symbols, or the LDFLAGS so that the > linker realises that it can chose one of the symbols. > > > > Please head over to the github issue and continue discussion for fixes > there, I can also test and upload any suggested patches to the > SinglePackageBuilder. > > > > Thanks for any help, > > yours, > > Steffen > > > -- > Laurent Gatto | @lgatt0 > http://cpu.sysbiol.cam.ac.uk/ > http://lgatto.github.io/ > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
