Dear Martin,

All of these suggestions sound good.

Wolfgang's suggestion regarding possible associated papers might be also great.

Another useful information would be to point to other publications where a 
given package was used, and cited.
I don't know if it's technically possible, but it would be greatly informative 
to know how frequently a package is used, and how it performs, in real contexts.

Frederic Commo
Bioinformatics, U981
Gustave Roussy

________________________________________
De : Bioc-devel [bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org] de la part de Wolfgang Huber 
[whu...@embl.de]
Date d'envoi : samedi 9 mai 2015 19:57
À : Martin Morgan
Cc: bioc-devel@r-project.org
Objet : Re: [Bioc-devel] Use and Usability metrics / shields

Dear Martin

great idea.
"Current build status” could perhaps be wrapped with "Cross-platform 
availability” into some sort of “Availability / Accessibility”?

I wonder how informative it would be to make metrics such as
(i) citations of the associated paper
(ii) full-text mentions e.g. in PubmedCentral
actually useful. (i) could be flawed if package and paper are diverged; (ii) 
would require good disambiguation, e.g. like bioNerDS 
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/14/194 (or other tools? not my 
expertise). Do we have someone with capabilities in this area on this list?

PS  Martin you’ll like Fig. 2 of their paper.

Wolfgang





> On May 9, 2015, at 19:15 GMT+2, Martin Morgan <mtmor...@fredhutch.org> wrote:
>
> Bioc developers!
>
> It's important that our users be able to identify packages that are suitable 
> for their research question. Obviously a first step is to identify packages 
> in the appropriate research domain, for instance through biocViews.
>
>  http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/
>
> We'd like to help users further prioritize their efforts by summarizing use 
> and usability. Metrics include:
>
> - Cross-platform availability -- biocLite()-able from all or only some 
> platforms
> - Support forum activity -- questions and comments / responses, 6 month window
> - Download percentile -- top 5, 20, 50%, or 'available'
> - Current build status -- errors or warnings on some or all platforms
> - Developer activity -- commits in the last 6 months
> - Historical presence -- years in Bioconductor
>
> Obviously the metrics are imperfect, so constructive feedback welcome -- we 
> think the above capture in a more-or-less objective and computable way the 
> major axes influencing use and usability.
>
> We initially intend to prominently display 'shields' (small graphical icons) 
> on package landing pages.
>
> Thanks in advance for your comments,
>
> Martin Morgan
> Bioconductor
> --
> Computational Biology / Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
> 1100 Fairview Ave. N.
> PO Box 19024 Seattle, WA 98109
>
> Location: Arnold Building M1 B861
> Phone: (206) 667-2793
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to