Hi,
Sorry for bothering you with another update on this matter. I changed
the Makevars file to the following:
SAMTOOLS_PATH=\
`echo 'cat(system.file("usrlib", package="Rsamtools",
mustWork=TRUE), .Platform[["r_arch"]], sep="/")' |\
"${R_HOME}/bin/R" --vanilla --slave`
SAMTOOLS_LIBS="$(SAMTOOLS_PATH)/libbam.a" "$(SAMTOOLS_PATH)/libbcf.a"\
"$(SAMTOOLS_PATH)/libtabix.a" -lz -pthread
SAMTOOLS_CPPFLAGS=-D_USE_KNETFILE -DBGZF_CACHE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 \
-D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
PKG_LIBS=$(SAMTOOLS_LIBS)
PKG_CPPFLAGS=$(SAMTOOLS_CPPFLAGS)
Note the ".Platform..." in the second line. As to be expected, now it
works on R-devel 3.2.0. Is this a good approach to use? Should the
documentation of Rsamtools be updated in that direction or is my R-devel
wrongly putting the static libs in usrlib/x86_64?
The Windows problem I reported earlier today is more or less the same:
the library objects are not found and therefore my package does not find
call entries for the tabix API functions that I call from my package.
Any help is gratefully appreciated!
Best regards,
Ulrich
On 03/19/2015 06:11 PM, Nathaniel Hayden wrote:
Hi, Ulrich. I just built R-devel (on Ubuntu) from trunk and installed
Rsamtools using biocLite; the libraries ended up where I expect them:
> dir(system.file(package="Rsamtools", "usrlib"))
[1] "libbam.a" "libbcf.a" "libtabix.a"
> sessionInfo()
R Under development (unstable) (2015-03-19 r68032)
Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS
locale:
[1] LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=C
[3] LC_TIME=en_US.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=en_US.UTF-8
[5] LC_MONETARY=en_US.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
[7] LC_PAPER=en_US.UTF-8 LC_NAME=C
[9] LC_ADDRESS=C LC_TELEPHONE=C
[11] LC_MEASUREMENT=en_US.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C
attached base packages:
[1] parallel stats4 stats graphics grDevices utils datasets
[8] methods base
other attached packages:
[1] Rsamtools_1.19.44 Biostrings_2.35.11 XVector_0.7.4
[4] GenomicRanges_1.19.46 GenomeInfoDb_1.3.14 IRanges_2.1.43
[7] S4Vectors_0.5.22 BiocGenerics_0.13.7
loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] zlibbioc_1.13.2 bitops_1.0-6
Have you seen the updated recommendations for linking to the libraries
in the Rsamtools Using samtools C libraries vignette?
http://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/Rsamtools/inst/doc/Rsamtools-UsingCLibraries.pdf
It was a breaking change in how Rsamtools reverse dependencies are
supposed to find the libraries prompted by the new R CMD check
warnings re: GNU make-specific extensions in non-Windows Makevars.
On 03/19/2015 07:59 AM, Ulrich Bodenhofer wrote:
Hi,
I am currently finishing a package for submission to Bioconductor 3.1
and, therefore, I am trying to make everything work on the latest
R-devel, but I have an issue with linking to Rsamtools. It seems that
Rsamtools installs the libraries libbam, libbcf, and libtabix to the
usrlib/x86_64/ directory in its package directory, but packages linking
to Rsamtools seem to expect the libraries in usrlib/. Because of this
problem, neither my package nor other packages relying on Rsamtools,
e.g. VariantAnnotation, can be installed. The check results on
http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.1/bioc-LATEST/ tell me that there
is no such issue on the BioC build servers, but the R-devel used on
these machines is much older than mine. Any clues?
I am using "R Under development (unstable) (2015-03-18 r68019)" on
64-bit Linux which I installed today. However, the problem already
occured on last week's R-devel. The problem is really serious for me
because I cannot test my package as long as it cannot link to Rsamtools.
I want to emphasize that my package passes
all checks without any errors or warnings on R 3.1.2 and Bioconductor
3.1. So I do not think I am doing anything wrong (and the developers of
VariantAnnotation neither).
Any help is gratefully appreciated.
Thanks,
Ulrich
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
