----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" <kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com>
> To: "Tiphaine Martin" <tiphaine.mar...@kcl.ac.uk>
> Cc: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtene...@fredhutch.org>, "bioc-devel" 
> <bioc-devel@r-project.org>
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 6:43:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor 3.1 release schedule now available
> 
> 
> If your package passes build and check without warnings it happens
> automatically, including the version bump.
> 

Yes, the only time you need to let us know is if you DO NOT want your package 
in the release.

> 
> If this is the first release of your package, it should have a
> version number of 0.99.Z (which seems to be the case). This is
> checked / fixed when your package gets accepted.
> 

Actually it's done during the release process. So your package will remain at 
0.99.z until the release but then in the new release branch it will be 1.0.0 
and in the new devel (trunk) it will be 1.1.0. See 
http://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/version-numbering/

Dan


> 
> Best,
> Kasper
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Martin, Tiphaine <
> tiphaine.mar...@kcl.ac.uk > wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Dan,
> 
> I have 2 naive questions.
> I would like to know whether we (developers of a R package currently
> only in the development version of Bioconductor) need to say that we
> would like to have our packages accessible in the next version of
> Bioconductor or it is automatic for any packages passing R CMD build
> and check without warning.
> If I have my new package that is going in the next release, should I
> need to upgrade the version of my package ( from 0.99.Z to 1.0.0 )
> and push it in svn or is it also done automatically ?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tiphaine
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Bioc-devel < bioc-devel-boun...@r-project.org > on behalf of
> Dan Tenenbaum < dtene...@fredhutch.org >
> Sent: 27 February 2015 18:14
> To: bioc-devel
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor 3.1 release schedule now
> available
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dan Tenenbaum" < dtene...@fredhutch.org >
> > To: "bioc-devel" < bioc-devel@r-project.org >
> > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 10:12:44 AM
> > Subject: [Bioc-devel] Bioconductor 3.1 release schedule now
> > available
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The next version of Bioconductor will be 3.0 and its release
> > schedule
> > is now up on our website:
> > 
> 
> 3.1 of course! Sorry for the typo.
> Dan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to