That's a cool package; nice that someone addressed that problem systematically. I wasn't suggesting moving stuff into S4Vectors; just closer to that level. But perhaps matrixStats is just the way to go for rowQ. There are similar things in Biobase though; rowQ was just an example.
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen < kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to remind you of matrixStats by Henrik Bengstson which basically > have all of the > rowXX > colXX > for many choices of XX. This unifies a number of utils which are now > spread across multiple packages. > > It would be great to have all of the matrixStats functions (there are not > that many) operational on these new objects. > > Kasper > > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Vincent Carey < > st...@channing.harvard.edu> wrote: > >> i think they should probably move, but i wonder if S4Vectors is the right >> destination. >> >> is the row concept vector-like? i was looking for rowQ recently and >> expected it to be in genefilter... >> >> >> On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Michael Lawrence < >> lawrence.mich...@gene.com> wrote: >> >> > Would it make sense to take low-level utilities like rowQ from Biobase >> and >> > move them closer the S4Vectors level? >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel >> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
