Sounds reasonable, _especially_ if you think it is faster. You're the expert. I assume you will allow the user to choose the return value? Having the option of Rle's is still nice, for some use cases.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Michael Lawrence <lawrence.mich...@gene.com > wrote: > Just a thought: support coverage calculation directly to IntegerList. Will > very often be faster than RleList, especially when limiting to regions > without long runs of zeros, and with WGS data. > > Something to put on the TODO list? > > Michael > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > _______________________________________________ > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] _______________________________________________ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
