On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Kasper Daniel Hansen <
kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Unfortunately, you may want to be careful about making it too robust
> (depending on what you mean).  For example filtering methods could very
> well be seen as replacing one matrix with a smaller one.  Not sure if these
> methods use exprs<-, but that is probably how I would do it.
>
> What would be better is if in the process of doing the replacement, the
> other slots are harmonized in a relevant way.  That would require row names
> on the replacement matrix.
>

I suspect I also have used exprs<- to change the number of rows of an
ExpressionSet during analyses, when there were no featureData. Not that I
mind changing, but it may not be unusual "out there."

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to