Great. I already have unit tests there for IntervalForest and GIntervalTree.
Hector


On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Vincent Carey
<st...@channing.harvard.edu>wrote:

> Fine with me, as long as he is acquainted with the build/test before commit
> practices that we are supposed
> to follow.  Breaking IRanges can have severe repercussions.
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Michael Lawrence <
> lawrence.mich...@gene.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Would it be feasible/acceptable to give Hector permission to commit?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Hector Corrada Bravo <
> hcorr...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > That's great! There's some cleaning up to do there how should we do
> this
> > > post-merge?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Valerie Obenchain <voben...@fhcrc.org
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Hector, Michael,
> > >>
> > >> This sounds great. Bringing these into svn is fine with us. Michael,
> do
> > >> you want to merge these in?
> > >>
> > >> Val
> > >>
> > >> On 05/24/2013 07:30 AM, Hector Corrada Bravo wrote:
> > >> > Thanks Michael,
> > >> >
> > >> > It has made significant difference for our visualization project. I
> > >> would
> > >> > like to merge this into svn asap. Can I get a ruling from the rest
> of
> > >> the
> > >> > core group? Please let me know if/when/how to proceed.
> > >> >
> > >> > Cheers,
> > >> > Hector
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Michael Lawrence <
> > >> lawrence.mich...@gene.com
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> *Added bioc-devel; hope you don't mind*
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hector,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This is great stuff. The overall design is on the right track. As
> you
> > >> >> said, there's a bit of cleaning to do, but I think we should merge
> > >> this
> > >> >> into svn and work the rest out from there. This will really benefit
> > >> >> performance, especially for visualization. Of course, I can't speak
> > >> for the
> > >> >> others.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Michael
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Hector Corrada Bravo <
> > >> >> hcorr...@umiacs.umd.edu> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> Since the semester is over I finally finished this...
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Recall that I wanted a persistent set of IntervalTrees for GRanges
> > >> >>> objects for repeated querying. (The application is this:
> > >> >>> http://epiviz.cbcb.umd.edu/help/?page_id=62 which I hope to get
> out
> > >> >>> soon). Folding this into IRanges and GenomicRanges would make our
> > >> life
> > >> >>> easier come installation time.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I've implemented class 'IntervalForest' within IRanges following
> > >> >>> Michael's suggestion of storing this as an array of rbTree on the
> C
> > >> side.
> > >> >>> I've implemented findOverlaps that operates with this array in C.
> > >> There is
> > >> >>> code duplication in IntervalTree.c that could be reduced but
> that's
> > >> if this
> > >> >>> makes it into the package.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I've also implemented a 'GIntervalTree' that uses 'IntervalForest'
> > >> >>> underneath. findOverlaps-GenomicRanges-GIntervalTree-method is
> > >> implemented
> > >> >>> for this class. I didn't touch the existing
> > >> >>> findOverlaps-GenomicRanges-GenomicRanges-method.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> You can pull these here:
> > >> >>> http://github.com/hcorrada/IRanges
> > >> >>> http://github.com/hcorrada/GenomicRanges
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> These track the devel branch of the two packages. Let me know the
> > >> best
> > >> >>> way to propagate to svn if you guys want this. It needs
> > >> documentation, but
> > >> >>> I'll add that once implementation is settled.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Kasper, I'm not sure if this would help with the 'too many
> > seqlevels'
> > >> >>> problem but I'd be curious to know if you try it.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Cheers,
> > >> >>> Hector
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >> >
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > >> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
>
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>

        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Reply via email to