All,
I wanted to better understand the use-case of having a DNS server provide 
localhost lookup. I think every OS has a hosts file with localhost set for 
127.0.0.1. This is an instantaneous resolution for localhost, rather than going 
through the process of setting of a network connection or worse (TCP socket 
with TLS).
Offhand, having a DNS server resolve this seems like unnecessary traffic.
I would be interested in the timing difference between having curl.localhost in 
the hosts file versus your DNS server.
This may also allow your localhost resolution and services to continue should 
something prevent you from reaching the DNS server (or network delays) - thus 
improving uptime.
________________________________
From: bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> on behalf of Eric 
<e...@digitalert.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2025 9:39 PM
To: Lee <ler...@gmail.com>
Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
Subject: Re: localhost name lookup

This email originated from outside of TESLA

Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
the content is safe.

I did, but my thought would be it's up to the dns admin to define those zone 
configurations as you have done. I may be wrong though.



Jan 12, 2025 6:36:03 PM Lee <ler...@gmail.com>:

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 5:15 PM Eric wrote:
>>
>> That is means that the 'domain' is reserved and can be used locally. It 
>> doesn't specify all records in that namespace / domain will resolve to 
>> 127.0.01.
>>
>> Think of it like .com
>>
>> If you want every A record in *.localhost to resolve to 127.0.0.1 what you 
>> did will do that.
>
> Did you look at the RFC?
>
>    4.  Caching DNS servers SHOULD recognize localhost names as special
>        and SHOULD NOT attempt to look up NS records for them, or
>        otherwise query authoritative DNS servers in an attempt to
>        resolve localhost names.  Instead, caching DNS servers SHOULD,
>        for all such address queries, generate an immediate positive
>        response giving the IP loopback address...
>
>    5.  Authoritative DNS servers SHOULD recognize localhost names as
>        special and handle them as described above for caching DNS
>        servers.
>
> So OK.. SHOULD isn't the same as MUST so bind as configured isn't
> violating that RFC.  But is there a _good_ reason to not follow the
> SHOULD recommendation?
>
> Thanks,
> Lee
>
>>
>> Jan 12, 2025 4:38:09 PM Lee:
>>
>>> Excuse my ignorance, but
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6761#section-6.3
>>>
>>>    The domain "localhost." and any names falling within ".localhost."
>>>    are special in the following ways:
>>>
>>> sure seems to mean that if I lookup curlmachine.localhost I should get
>>> a 127.0.0.1 or ::1 address returned.  Correct?
>>>
>>> I had to change my db.local file to
>>>
>>> $ cat db.local
>>> ;
>>> ; BIND data file for local loopback interface
>>> ;
>>> $TTL    604800
>>> @       IN      SOA     localhost. root.localhost. (
>>>                               3         ; Serial
>>>                          604800         ; Refresh
>>>                           86400         ; Retry
>>>                         2419200         ; Expire
>>>                          604800 )       ; Negative Cache TTL
>>> ;
>>> @       IN      NS      localhost.
>>> @       IN      A       127.0.0.1
>>> @       IN      AAAA    ::1
>>>
>>> *       IN      A       127.0.0.1
>>>         IN      AAAA    ::1
>>>
>>>
>>> to make localhost and curl.localhost work.
>>>
>>> Is this wrong?  and if so, why?
>>>
>>> TIA,
>>> Lee
>>> --
>>> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
>>> this list
>>>
>>> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
>>> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
>>>
>>>
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to