see RFC 2182 for info on secondary dns servers https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2182
e.g. nor so good to have the on the same subnet Scott > On Nov 18, 2024, at 1:03 PM, Jean-François Bachelet <jfbache...@free.fr> > wrote: > > Hello folks :) > > just to be sure, in case we have two (internals) dns servers on the same > network (for the case of one is unavaillable), if I understand well the docs, > the two servers should have the exact same configurations, appart that the > secondary is stated as 'secondary' and the first 'master'. > > that for both confs and zones and etc... > > > Am I right or wrong there ? if not, what much differences should it have ? > > Thanks by advance for the advice :) > > Regards, > Jeff > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
