I've been looking at RFC8624 and there is no mention of SHA-512 - just this:

   +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+
   | Number | Mnemonics       | DNSSEC Delegation | DNSSEC Validation |
   +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+
   | 0      | NULL (CDS only) | MUST NOT [*]      | MUST NOT [*]      |
   | 1      | SHA-1           | MUST NOT          | MUST              |
   | 2      | SHA-256         | MUST              | MUST              |
   | 3      | GOST R 34.11-94 | MUST NOT          | MAY               |
   | 4      | SHA-384         | MAY               | RECOMMENDED       |
   +--------+-----------------+-------------------+-------------------+


Are there any newer RFCs or guidelines regarding DNSSEC algorithms?


   Danilo




On 16. 10. 24 14:15, Robert Wagner wrote:
Our preference would be to at least allow SHA-384 and SHA-512 per the CNSA 2.0 requirements: CSA_CNSA_2.0_ALGORITHMS_.PDF (defense.gov) <https://media.defense.gov/2022/Sep/07/2003071834/-1/-1/0/CSA_CNSA_2.0_ALGORITHMS_.PDF>


My understanding is this will be the base requirement for all US Government cryptography.


RW

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* bind-users <bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org> on behalf of Danilo Godec via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 16, 2024 8:00 AM
*To:* bind-users@lists.isc.org <bind-users@lists.isc.org>
*Subject:* DS digest type(s)
This email originated from outside of TESLA

Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi,


I've been doing some more reading into DNSSEC and if I understand
correctly, it is allowed to have multiple DS records for one KSK - with
different digest types. Apparently, SHA-1 is deprecated and shouldn't be
used anymore, while SHA-256 is mandatory and has to exist.

That leaves SHA-384, which is optional and I can generate manually with
'dnssec-dsfromkey'. Since I have to ask my registrar to add DS records
to parent zones (.eu in this case), I can just send them both records,
right?


Is it also possible to have dnssec-policy to generate both digest types
as CDS records?


     Regards,

     Danilo


--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users



Lep pozdrav / Best regards,
--
Danilo Godec | Sistemska podpora / System Administration
AGENDA d.o.o. | Ul. Pohorskega bataljona 49, Sl-2000 Maribor
E: danilo.go...@agenda.si | T: +386 (0)2 421 61 31
Agenda OpenSystems <https://www.agenda.si/> | Največji slovenski odprtokodni integrator Red Hat v Sloveniji <http://www.redhat.si/> | Red Hat Premier Business Partner
ElasticBox <http://elasticbox.eu/> | Poslovne rešitve v oblaku
Agenda d.o.o. <https://www.agenda.si/>
Izjava o omejitvi odgovornosti / Legal disclaimer statement <https://www.agenda.si/index.php?id=228>
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to