Matthijs Mekking <matth...@isc.org> wrote:
    > As the main developer of dnssec-policy, I would like to confirm that
    > what has been said by Michael and Nick are correct.

Cool.

    > - When migrating to dnssec-policy, make sure the configuration matches
    > your existing keys.

Is there a way to validate the policy against what's in a specific 
zone/directory?
Effectively, "do your key management stuff --just-kidding --verbose"?

    > - Most issues that were shared on this list have to do with migrating
    > to dnssec-policy.

Agreed: and it bit me, and I am still a bit shell shocked.

    > - If you feel like the DS is stuck in 'rumoured' state you might need
    > to run 'rndc dnssec -checkds seen' on the key.

okay, good to know this.
. o O ( Umbrella Academy )

    > - It is not recommended to switch to dnssec-policy if you are currently
    > in a rollover.

    > I acknowledge that migration takes some care and I wish the process was
    > easier. We have some ideas to make it less error prone, but I haven't
    > found the time to work on that.

Are there open issues?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to