This is a horrible reason to enable serve-stale. Serve stale is a bandaid. You should increase a resiliency of the architecture - have more nameservers for the domain, make the restarts seamless, etc.
Serve-stale was meant to deal with unexpected outages and not as a workaround for bad engineering in the first place. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him) My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours. > On 6. 11. 2023, at 3:04, Prasanna Mathivanan (pmathiva) via bind-users > <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > > > Hi team, > > If there is a scenario where NS are not reachable, until its up we can serve > from cache. > > Enabling serve-stale can help us with this use case, is it safe to enable > this parameter and what should be the recommended value set for max-stale-ttl > ? > > -- > Regards, > Prasanna > > -- > Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from > this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
