E R <fasteddieinaus...@gmail.com> wrote:
    > I am planning on implementing the current version of BIND to replace the
    > aging, undocumented authoritative servers I inherited.  I want to hide the
    > primary server on our internal network and have two secondary servers be
    > publicly available.  While reading the DNSSEC Guide
    > <https://bind9.readthedocs.io/en/v9_18_9/dnssec-guide.html#recipes> 
recipes
    > it seems to imply that I cannot have a hidden primary that handles all the
    > DNSSEC stuff.

Many people do exactly that.
Check out the: “Bump in the Wire” Signing section.

In my opinion, this is the best way to do things, and the in-place signing is
just a total pain.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to