> On 24. 8. 2022, at 8:48, Evan Hunt <e...@isc.org> wrote: > >> In the absence of that, is caching from DLZ a possible configuration >> on a single BIND server? > > Not DLZ, no. And I'm not sure dyndb can be used for the cache database, > either; do you know something about it that I don't? > > It would definitely be easier to *make* dyndb work for the cache; > it has all the necessary API calls, and DLZ doesn't. But I don't > know a way to configure it to take the place of the cache currently. > If you do, please educate me.
I am fairly confident that any advantage from shared cache will be lost because the extra latency caused by communication with the MongoDB (or any other no-sql systems). Perhaps, describing the use case first (why do you want to use MongoDB at all) might have the benefit of not wasting time on your end. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
