> On 9. 5. 2022, at 13:19, Veronique Lefebure <veronique.lefeb...@cern.ch> > wrote: > > If the problem is simply ipv6, is it correct to say that the BIND messages > above are misleading ? > Or is there really a EDNS-related issue ?
named has no way why the remote server didn’t reply and assumes it was EDNS Can **you** tell if the problem why the server didn’t respond was IPv6 and not EDNS over IPv6? It’s impossible to tell whether the IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are handled on the same machine not to mention same software. Ondrej -- Ondřej Surý (He/Him) ond...@isc.org My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
