The .by domain is kind of bonkers…

Step 1: get nameservers for 103.by:

$ dig +noall +authority IN NS 103.by. @a.root-servers.net
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns1.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns2.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns3.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns4.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns5.tld.becloudby.com.

Step 2: get nameservers for becloudy.com:

$ dig +noall +authority IN NS becloudby.com. @a.root-servers.net
com.                    172800  IN      NS      e.gtld-servers.net.
com.                    172800  IN      NS      b.gtld-servers.net.
[…]

$ dig +noall +authority IN NS becloudby.com. @a.gtld-servers.net.
becloudby.com.          172800  IN      NS      u1.hoster.by.
becloudby.com.          172800  IN      NS      u2.hoster.by.

Step 3: get nameservers for hoster.by

$ dig +noall +authority IN NS hoster.by. @a.root-servers.net
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns1.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns2.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns3.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns4.tld.becloudby.com.
by.                     172800  IN      NS      dns5.tld.becloudby.com.

Step 4: get nameservers for  becloudy.com:

[…]

My guess is that it probably depends on the current state of the cache
whether `named` is able to break out of the loop using the existing data
or not.

From the log, I can see that it’s hitting the SERVFAIL cache.

You can disable the servfail caching with:

``servfail-ttl``
   This sets the number of seconds to cache a SERVFAIL response due to DNSSEC
   validation failure or other general server failure. If set to ``0``,
   SERVFAIL caching is disabled. The SERVFAIL cache is not consulted if
   a query has the CD (Checking Disabled) bit set; this allows a query
   that failed due to DNSSEC validation to be retried without waiting
   for the SERVFAIL TTL to expire.

   The maximum value is ``30`` seconds; any higher value is
   silently reduced. The default is ``1`` second.

And see if that helps.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý (He/Him)
ond...@isc.org

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel 
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.

> On 29. 3. 2022, at 16:02, Dzmitry Shykuts <dshyk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello! Can anybody help me with periodic and critical for me SERVFAIL? Cannot 
> determine the source of the problem.
> 
> I have Debian 11.3 and BIND9 9.16.27 on it. There was no such problem earlier.
> 
> I do request:
> 
>  <<>> DiG 9.16.27-Debian <<>> 103.by +trace
> ;; global options: +cmd
> . 518377 IN NS e.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS a.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS h.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS k.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS b.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS i.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS j.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS d.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS c.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS m.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS f.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS g.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN NS l.root-servers.net.
> . 518377 IN RRSIG NS 8 0 518400 20220411050000 20220329040000 9799 . 
> keszTJZg3TCzY3s4UyinKYe7VwZGGf/8kHoWzJ2Ab3n4ctBt8gtleqC0 
> UZqIIjc9Ez9srWGGeNn2gRUtB65QvL99oX5gD5VI6h1SY81OC0HcBx2c 
> 80SZJ0s9qpNmkDDcp4EUNlgoheDkBAtB3MsIRIVA6T746gBthcVKLHxC 
> rpOy7ELdgDtHwtq8jL5QIFae6QlIGuO95nflzk31VoL/yhCxvpzIXEfq 
> QJlJQf21YJtAtYnY7vJJwuDVT20y/cj5W7PNxSkNLMoukqUXOeH/w2yB 
> 0yNkwbKLBZUkyrE5tQmlq5AnScofbT7ffOYB9o9ug39DgCTcqSeNZDYX 0Gekmg==
> ;; Received 1137 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 3 ms
> 
> by. 172800 IN NS dns5.tld.becloudby.com.
> by. 172800 IN NS dns2.tld.becloudby.com.
> by. 172800 IN NS dns3.tld.becloudby.com.
> by. 172800 IN NS dns4.tld.becloudby.com.
> by. 172800 IN NS dns1.tld.becloudby.com.
> by. 86400 IN DS 495 13 2 
> 2D14284F8E47B53F839BD8068D438680B4B6C7A645769C9D89B47DF0 C5359B7B
> by. 86400 IN RRSIG DS 8 1 86400 20220411050000 20220329040000 9799 . 
> IAk+oEOmuQVbb8RyxB9ML/GOwnLIaQdi0XMD8Y7san2AIx2lXeEZp3AV 
> fNgYQfTnVrGyi3ylXNkVmQXnqDdrPK8iJu6mKvmaI40sQwv8xDyx5Fnz 
> VaNHcY4+J3fQwSp+TrFxQuAlW3g3CFaUVNLk20V/TQUycVA75c+3TrW4 
> IQJ1aua0lDsG1JS7BigHryUH9Vy8nSyuikYOIiML0BTTTqFQN7yk4AiE 
> 3gbYMuCsMHQKfAIXpswc/i1eGEW7yi5USnQqza4P2YEDrUhSUps5N2u5 
> /UwdS1BsmW17WZRbfDudeL4y471jwKhYgCCycGI1whtToDA452nvDJL2 it6mlg==
> couldn't get address for 'dns5.tld.becloudby.com': failure
> couldn't get address for 'dns2.tld.becloudby.com': failure
> couldn't get address for 'dns3.tld.becloudby.com': failure
> couldn't get address for 'dns4.tld.becloudby.com': failure
> couldn't get address for 'dns1.tld.becloudby.com': failure
> dig: couldn't get address for 'dns5.tld.becloudby.com': no more
> 
> Request SERVFAILed. When I do "rndc flush" several times, the problem has 
> gone for a while. After some time I get SERVFAIL again. Now I'm forwarding 
> the zone to Google DNS and there is no such problem.
> 
> There is a some debug log from BIND of the problem:
> 
> <named.txt>-- 
> Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
> this list
> 
> ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
> Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
> 
> 
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to