> On 25. 3. 2022, at 16:16, Borja Marcos <bor...@sarenet.es> wrote:
> 
> That said (and this is just an opinion) with all due respect of course, if 
> bind evolves in a way that makes
> it much harder to build on non Linux systems, I am concerned. 

That’s simply not true in general. We stopped supporting **dead** systems, but 
we do not prevent anybody from doing the porting.

Just check this:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=bind9

The only thing failing is GNU Hurd, sh4 and m68k architectures.

These are issues related to MacPorts:

https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues?scope=all&state=closed&search=Macports

For all of these, we either prepared and/or merged a fix or provided a 
workaround (for the second issue on the list, you need to run autoreconf -if).

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý — ISC (He/Him)

My working hours and your working hours may be different. Please do not feel 
obligated to reply outside your normal working hours.

> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Borja.
> 
> 
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to