Our DMARC Policy has been "p=quarantine" since 30 Jun 2019, so I guess it won't affect us. (It was "p=none" before that -- we only started using DKIM in Apr 2017.)
On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Dan Mahoney <dmaho...@isc.org> wrote: > Greetings bind-users netizens. > > Dan Mahoney, ISC SysAdmin here. > > This is a message about lists.isc.org and DMARC. If you aren't concerned > with DMARC, you can ignore it. > > Over a year ago, we added adaptations to lists.isc.org to allow mail from > DMARC-protected domains to be delivered. > > If you've seen problems with the way lists.isc.org currently handles DMARC > (rewriting the From: header if your sending-domain has a restrictive > [p=reject or p=quarantine] DMARC policy), we'd like to hear from you at > listmas...@isc.org as we are considering making a slightly broader change. > > We are considering setting lists.isc.org to ALSO rewrite the From: header, > even if your sending-domain has a DMARC (p=none) policy. We think this is > important because otherwise a domain, in rolling out DMARC with p=none to > start, will see false positives from mailing lists (indicating that > messages sent via that list would be rejected by the final recipients' > mailservers/filters). > > We believe it makes sense for lists.isc.org to behave the same for *ANY* > DMARC policy and are considering implementing that in the next few weeks. > We will keep you updated here. > > -Dan Mahoney > ISC _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
