SPF records are TXT record which are NOT subject to check-names processing.
If you created a seperate zone use nameservers that DO NOT live within the zone. ns1._spf.switch.ch is NOT a legal hostname as it is not LDH. > On 4 Jan 2021, at 20:01, Daniel Stirnimann <daniel.stirnim...@switch.ch> > wrote: > > Hello all, > > I changed SPF for switch.ch to use SPF macros (RFC 7208). I wanted to > use the "_spf" label but bind9 check-names complained with a "bad owner > name (check-names)" message. > > I have now used "spf" instead of "_spf", e.g. exists:%{ir}.spf.switch.ch > > I didn't want to disable check-names for switch.ch because of this > conflict. However, SPF record publishing is generally recommended to use > the "_spf" subdomain which is not possible in this case. > > I guess, the only alternative would have been to make "_spf.switch.ch" > its own zone and set check-names for this zone statement to "ignore". Or > would this be a good reasons to loosen the check-names rules in bind9? > > Thanks, > Daniel > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. > Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. > > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users