On 10/20/20 3:54 PM, Axel Rau wrote:
Am 20.10.2020 um 16:02 schrieb Sami Ait Ali Oulahcen <s...@marwan.ma
<mailto:s...@marwan.ma>>:
I don't see the part where the acls are used.
Yes, acls have nothing to do with the notify, instead they are used in
an allow-transfer statement.
Is "also-notify" meant to be "allow-notify" ?
No:
From bind 9.16 ARM:
also-notify
Yes, sorry just realized after sending. I never used that option before.
It shouldn't be an issue with the stack, we've been using v6 for
notifies for years.
Only meaningful if notify is active for this zone. The set of machines
that will receive a DNS NOTIFY message for this zone is made up of all
the listed name servers (other than the primary master) for the zone
plus any IP addresses specified with also-notify. A port may be
specified with each also-notify address to send the notify messages to a
port other than the default of 53. A TSIG key may also be specified to
cause the NOTIFY to be signed by the given key. also-notify is not
meaningful for stub zones. The default is the empty list.
Axel
---
PGP-Key: CDE74120 ☀ computing @ chaos claudius
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
