On 21.08.20 09:28, Smile TV wrote:
> my question is why would anyone do this, as this apparently does not make
sense.
Because when I was from a server that was querying the reverse record
250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa it gave an error with the "SERVFAIL" error
code so I tried to query directly to the hosting that managed it to
determine the cause.
your query of course makes sense under there curcumstances.
But delegating /24 subnet using RFC2317 delegation is useless, because in
fact you can delegate whole /24 directly
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 7:42 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>> <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote:
>>> again, why you query for 250.0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa
>>> under normal circumstances there's no point of querying that name.
> On 19.08.20 10:05, tale via bind-users wrote:
>> Well yes and no. While an individual user would typically not,
>> resolvers sure will. While trying to resolve
>> 250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa, it will eventually get to
>> 250.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa CNAME 250.0-24.199.212.125.in-addr.arpa.
> On 20 Aug 2020, at 00:41, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
> wrote:
> my question is why would anyone do this, as this apparently does not make
> sense.
Vào Th 4, 19 thg 8, 2020 vào lúc 22:00 Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> đã
viết:
Presumably because they don’t know that APNIC can delegate the /24s that
make
up the /17 independently of each other.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
How does cat play with mouse? cat /dev/mouse
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions.
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
