Am 15.04.20 um 14:17 schrieb Jim Popovitch via bind-users: > On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 10:35 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Thanks for answer! >> >> So actually it is just a cosmetic change not addressing a real problem. >> >> I will miss the bind9 service :-( > > > Wait until you find out about Predicatable Network Interface Names and > iptables rules. :) "net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0" is your friend :-) _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the servi... Reindl Harald
- AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the s... Klaus Darilion
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was t... Reindl Harald
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why ... Reindl Harald
- AW: Debian/Ubuntu: ... Klaus Darilion
- Re: [External] AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Wh... Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: [External] AW: Debian/Ubuntu... Reindl Harald
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service rename... Ondřej Surý
- AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service r... Klaus Darilion
- Re: AW: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the s... Jim Popovitch via bind-users
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the s... Reindl Harald
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was t... Jim Popovitch via bind-users
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service r... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Debian/Ubuntu: Why was the service r... Dennis Clarke via bind-users