> On Feb 23, 2020, at 6:57 AM, @lbutlr <krem...@kreme.com> wrote: > > On 22 Feb 2020, at 18:25, Scott A. Wozny <sawo...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> I’m setting up hot-hot webserver clusters hosted on the west and east coasts >> of the US and would like to use Bind 9.11.4 > > I’d consider changing that version. While Bind 9.11 *is* still supported, it > is EOL at the end of this year. If you really really want to run 9.11, at > least run the latest patch level (9.11.6 should be coming really soon).
We will continue with security patches for 9.11 through the end of 2021, so 9.11 is not a bad choice for someone who doesn’t want to migrate for a long time. > > 9.14.10 is the current stable release and 9.11.15 is the current extended > support release. Unless you know something is broken in 9.14.10 (unlikely) > that would be the version to look at. 9.14 has just been replaced by 9.16, released just this past week. We will continue offering security releases for 9.14 for a 3-month period to support migration to 9.16. Someone doing a migration today should look at 9.16 rather than 9.14. > You absolutely should not be running a bind version several years old, as > 9.11.4 is. > agreed Victoria Risk Product Manager Internet Systems Consortium vi...@isc.org
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
