On 9/6/2019 12:10 PM, Victoria Risk wrote:
I really like what I'm seeing with the COPR distribution: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/isc/ The description there
still states "..USE AT YOUR OWN RISK.”

John- Do you still see those messages? I don’t see them. I thought I
removed all those comments about ‘experimental’ and ‘use at your own
risk’ a while ago.

No I don't . . . now that you call my attention to it.
I had guessed there would be an announcement on the blog, or to the announce-list if its status had changed. Obviously, that wasn't a valid assumption.


We did recently start setting up another site, Cloudsmith.io, for
some of our packages. We need a site we can control for non-public
stuff, like the BIND subscription edition, and private patches, and
Cloudsmith allows us to put packages for multiple different OSes in
one repo.  I need to find out whether we plan to continue updating
the COPR site or not.  I think we do,(because of course it is easier
to ‘find’ than Cloudsmith) but we haven’t discussed it explicitly.

Which makes it sound like the future of the COPR distribution isn't yet clear. This is a pretty important topic to us, and I'd welcome any information you can offer. I'm not trying to drive your product offerings, just trying to divine which way the wind is blowing.

From my perspective, I'm quite pleased with how the COPR distribution is working out. It was only a little bit of work to make the "software collection" concept meet our needs, and I'd dearly like to be able to consider it stable.

--
   Do things because you should, not just because you can.

John Thurston    907-465-8591
john.thurs...@alaska.gov
Department of Administration
State of Alaska
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to