On 13 Jun2019, at 17:48, Browne, Stuart via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > For options that have passed their warning phase and have been removed, I'm > all for BIND failing to start and named-checkconf erroring out , rather than > quietly ignoring them.
Yes, I think this is the best way, otherwise there will be useless kruft getting in the way forever. -- The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
