On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 06:28:02PM +0200, Alan Clegg wrote: > The answer to your question is: "someone at ISC".
Oh, I'm willing to take the public blame here, Alan. It's not like the commits don't have my name on them. The code the processes allow-update was written in an oddly circuitious fashion, and this combined with a badly misleading C comment led me to believe that allow-update and update-policy had the same rules about where they could be set - and, update-policy can only be set in zone statements. (This is personally embarrassing, but if you read the relevant code and comments in configure_view() you might see how easy it is to be misled.) I actually do still think that *ought* to be the rule for allow-update, but it wasn't, so when I cleaned things up I cleaned them up wrong, mea culpa. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
